How lucky can you get?
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, I apply Duncan Pritchard’s anti-luck epistemology to the case of knowledge through testimony. I claim (1) that Pritchard’s distinction between veritic and reflective luck provides a nice taxonomy of testimony cases, (2) that the taxonomic categories that emerge can be used to suggest precisely what epistemic statuses are transmissible through testimony, and (3) that the resulting picture can make clear how testimony can actually be knowledge-generating.
منابع مشابه
The water watchdog.
Q: When you’ve discovered problems, how have you gotten them addressed? A: Science by itself is powerless when you’re dealing with government agencies. I had to cross the line and become an activist, fi ling Freedom of Information Act requests and working with politicians and people on the ground. You have to reach this critical mass where you can put enough pressure on these agencies to make t...
متن کاملO-35: How Can You Decrease the Complicationof Ovarian Diathermy in Polycystic OvarianSyndrome
متن کامل
Overcommitment
Here you are, you have your first academic job. You were lucky to get it, of course, but you also worked very hard. You did enough high-profile research, sent out hundreds of job applications, went out on dozens of interviews, schmoozed with countless potential colleagues, negotiated setup funds, space and renovations, and now you’re a new assistant professor. What now? The answer is obvious: g...
متن کاملCMPT 407/710 - Complexity Theory: Lecture 10
Why is randomness useful? Imagine you have a stack of bank notes, with very few counterfeit ones. You want to choose a genuine bank note to pay at a store. However, suppose that you don’t know how to distinguish between a “good” bank note and a “bad” one. What can you do? Well, if you pick a bank note at random, you will be lucky with high probability (here the probability of picking a good ban...
متن کاملReview of Roger S . Pielke , Jr . , The Honest
Imagine you are a climate scientist, and you get a call from a politician asking whether she should support a proposal to impose mandatory caps on carbon-dioxide emissions. Lucky you! Should you urge support of the proposal? Or should you restrict yourself to explaining recent developments in climate science? Should you offer to answer any specific questions the politician might have about clim...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Synthese
دوره 158 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007